Sunday, November 6, 2011

What caused the financial crisis? The Big Lie goes viral.

Such a great piece from Barry I had to share....

I have a fairly simple approach to investing: Start with data and objective evidence to determine the dominant elements driving the market action right now. Figure out what objective reality is beneath all of the noise. Use that information to try to make intelligent investing decisions.
But then, I’m an investor focused on preserving capital and managing risk. I’m not out to win the next election or drive the debate. For those who are, facts and data matter much less than a narrative that supports their interests.
One group has been especially vocal about shaping a new narrative of the credit crisis and economic collapse: those whose bad judgment and failed philosophy helped cause the crisis.
Rather than admit the error of their ways — Repent! — these people are engaged in an active campaign to rewrite history. They are not, of course, exonerated in doing so. And beyond that, they damage the process of repairing what was broken. They muddy the waters when it comes to holding guilty parties responsible. They prevent measures from being put into place to prevent another crisis.
Here is the surprising takeaway: They are winning. Thanks to the endless repetition of the Big Lie.
A Big Lie is so colossal that no one would believe that someone could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. There are many examples: Claims that Earth is not warming, or that evolution is not the best thesis we have for how humans developed. Those opposed to stimulus spending have gone so far as to claim that the infrastructure of the United States is just fine, Grade A (not D, as the we discussed last month), and needs little repair.
Wall Street has its own version: Its Big Lie is that banks and investment houses are merely victims of the crash. You see, the entire boom and bust was caused by misguided government policies. It was not irresponsible lending or derivative or excess leverage or misguided compensation packages, but rather long-standing housing policies that were at fault.
Indeed, the arguments these folks make fail to withstand even casual scrutiny. But that has not stopped people who should know better from repeating them.
The Big Lie made a surprise appearance Tuesday when New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, responding to a question about Occupy Wall Street, stunned observers by exonerating Wall Street: “It was not the banks that created the mortgage crisis. It was, plain and simple, Congress who forced everybody to go and give mortgages to people who were on the cusp.”
What made his comments so stunning is that he built Bloomberg Data Services on the notion that data are what matter most to investors. The terminals are found on nearly 400,000 trading desks around the world, at a cost of $1,500 a month. (Do the math — that’s over half a billion dollars a month.) Perhaps the fact that Wall Street was the source of his vast wealth biased him. But the key principle of the business that made the mayor a billionaire is that fund managers, economists, researchers and traders should ignore the squishy narrative and, instead, focus on facts. Yet he ignored his own principles to repeat statements he should have known were false.
Why are people trying to rewrite the history of the crisis? Some are simply trying to save face. Interest groups who advocate for deregulation of the finance sector would prefer that deregulation not receive any blame for the crisis.
Some stand to profit from the status quo: Banks present a systemic risk to the economy, and reducing that risk by lowering their leverage and increasing capital requirements also lowers profitability. Others are hired guns, doing the bidding of bosses on Wall Street.
They all suffer cognitive dissonance — the intellectual crisis that occurs when a failed belief system or philosophy is confronted with proof of its implausibility.
And what about those facts? To be clear, no single issue was the cause. Our economy is a complex and intricate system. What caused the crisis? Look:
●Fed Chair Alan Greenspan dropped rates to 1 percent — levels not seen for half a century — and kept them there for an unprecedentedly long period. This caused a spiral in anything priced in dollars (i.e., oil, gold) or credit (i.e., housing) or liquidity driven (i.e., stocks).
●Low rates meant asset managers could no longer get decent yields from municipal bonds or Treasurys. Instead, they turned to high-yield mortgage-backed securities. Nearly all of them failed to do adequate due diligence before buying them, did not understand these instruments or the risk involved. They violated one of the most important rules of investing: Know what you own.
●Fund managers made this error because they relied on the credit ratings agencies — Moody’s, S&P and Fitch. They had placed an AAA rating on these junk securities, claiming they were as safe as U.S. Treasurys.
4 Derivatives had become a uniquely unregulated financial instrument. They are exempt from all oversight, counter-party disclosure, exchange listing requirements, state insurance supervision and, most important, reserve requirements. This allowed AIG to write $3 trillion in derivatives while reserving precisely zero dollars against future claims.
5 The Securities and Exchange Commission changed the leverage rules for just five Wall Street banks in 2004. The “Bear Stearns exemption” replaced the 1977 net capitalization rule’s 12-to-1 leverage limit. In its place, it allowed unlimited leverage for Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns. These banks ramped leverage to 20-, 30-, even 40-to-1. Extreme leverage leaves very little room for error.
6Wall Street’s compensation system was skewed toward short-term performance. It gives traders lots of upside and none of the downside. This creates incentives to take excessive risks.
7 The demand for higher-yielding paper led Wall Street to begin bundling mortgages. The highest yielding were subprime mortgages. This market was dominated by non-bank originators exempt from most regulations. The Fed could have supervised them, but Greenspan did not.
8 These mortgage originators’ lend-to-sell-to-securitizers model had them holding mortgages for a very short period. This allowed them to get creative with underwriting standards, abdicating traditional lending metrics such as income, credit rating, debt-service history and loan-to-value.
9 “Innovative” mortgage products were developed to reach more subprime borrowers. These include 2/28 adjustable-rate mortgages, interest-only loans, piggy-bank mortgages (simultaneous underlying mortgage and home-equity lines) and the notorious negative amortization loans (borrower’s indebtedness goes up each month). These mortgages defaulted in vastly disproportionate numbers to traditional 30-year fixed mortgages.
●To keep up with these newfangled originators, traditional banks developed automated underwriting systems. The software was gamed by employees paid on loan volume, not quality.
●Glass-Steagall legislation, which kept Wall Street and Main Street banks walled off from each other, was repealed in 1998. This allowed FDIC-insured banks, whose deposits were guaranteed by the government, to engage in highly risky business. It also allowed the banks to bulk up, becoming bigger, more complex and unwieldy.
●Many states had anti-predatory lending laws on their books (along with lower defaults and foreclosure rates). In 2004, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency federally preempted state laws regulating mortgage credit and national banks. Following this change, national lenders sold increasingly risky loan products in those states. Shortly after, their default and foreclosure rates skyrocketed.
Bloomberg was partially correct: Congress did radically deregulate the financial sector, doing away with many of the protections that had worked for decades. Congress allowed Wall Street to self-regulate, and the Fed the turned a blind eye to bank abuses.
The previous Big Lie — the discredited belief that free markets require no adult supervision — is the reason people have created a new false narrative.
Now it’s time for the Big Truth.


Related content:
More from Post Business
Pearlstein: You bet it’s another bubble
Sloan: The bailout was awful, but it worked
Ritholtz is chief executive of FusionIQ, a quantitative research firm. He is the author of “Bailout Nation” and runs a finance blog, the Big Picture.



saverio manzo


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ontario car insurance
SAVE  on cheap car insurance ontario
Financial Planning advice is important.
SMall Business help here
car insurance
car insurance Ontario  

Feel Green Good 

Ontario Car insurance for High Risk Drivers — 09/16/11
Whether you are currently shopping around for Ontario car insurance, your policy is about to expire, something in your record has changed, you’re looking to save money on your current policy or you have been refused car insurance coverage, a policy is out there for you. Here’s how to get your coverage with the best car insurance quote in Ontario

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Occupy Wall Street: The what, why and how

Upset with banks "too big to fail"? Or how about Tycoons taking advantage of government bailouts and getting richer by billions$? Fascinating movement happening all around the industrialized world.

There seems to be some debate as to what Occupy Wall Street should be focused on.
I have 3 suggestions — excerpted from my Sunday column in the Washington Post. You will note that these three are issues that both the Left and the Right — Libertarians and Liberals — should be able to agree upon:
1. No more bailouts/Bring Back Real Capitalism! The United States used to be a capitalist system. Companies lived and died on their own successes. “Corporate Welfare” – the term coined by Wisconsin senator William Proxmire – came into being in 1971 with the bailout of Lockheed Aircraft. Thus began a run of corporatism, not capitalism. Some companies, less than successful in a competitive marketplace, chose instead to suckle at the teat of the public trough. Innovation, execution and hard work were replaced with lobbying, crony capitalism and bailouts of failure. All of this paid for by taxpayers.

2. End Too Big To Fail/Restore Competition As George Shultz once said, “If they’re too big to fail, make them smaller.”
The current economic approach of “Too Big to Fail” is itself a failure. It reduces economic competition, concentrates risk, and raises costs for consumers. University of Missouri–Kansas City (UMKC) professor of Economics and Law William Black notes that the TBTF moniker is misleading. We should start calling these firms by the more accurate phrase “Systemically Dangerous Institutions” (SDIs). TBTF makes it sound like the size is the problem – in reality, the systemic risk, regardless of size, is what we should be focused on. SDI is an accurate phrase, and appropriately pejorative.

3. Take Congress back from Wall Street Whatever changes come, they will only be temporary if the current system of spoils is allowed to continue. The United States has become a “corporatocracy.” Campaign finance and lobbying money has so utterly corrupted Congress that we might as well put elected officials up for bid on eBay – that is how corrupted the system has become. We must become a democracy again, where one man one vote matters. To do that, Wall Street money must be taken out of the process.
The Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly on campaign finance reform, finding against voters and in favor of corporate interests. The only way to take the government back is a Constitutional Amendment.
Source: Barry Ritholtz

saverio manzo


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ontario car insurance
SAVE  on cheap car insurance ontario
Financial Planning advice is important.
SMall Business help here
car insurance quotes
car insurance Ontario  
Toronto car insurance 
Feel Green Good 

Ontario Car insurance for High Risk Drivers — 09/16/11
Whether you are currently shopping around for Ontario car insurance, your policy is about to expire, something in your record has changed, you’re looking to save money on your current policy or you have been refused car insurance coverage, a policy is out there for you. Here’s how to get your coverage with the best car insurance quote in Ontario
> Read more

 

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Apprenticed Investor: Know Thyself

Statistical evidence suggests a high probability that you underperformed the broader market last year, and most investors will likely underperform again this year. But it’s not just retail investors. The pros are barely any better. In fact, four out of five investors will do worse than the S&P 500 this year.
The problem, it seems, is a design flaw.

Indeed, many classic investor errors — overtrading, groupthink, panic selling, marrying positions (i.e., refusing to sell), chasing stocks, rationalizing, freezing up — are mostly due to our genetic makeup. Humans have evolved to survive in a harsh, competitive landscape. To do well in the capital markets, on the other hand, requires a skill set that is very often the antithesis of those innate survival instincts.
Why is that? The problems lay primarily in our large mammalian brains. It is actually better at some things than you may realize, but (unfortunately) much worse at many others you are unaware of. Most people are unaware they even have these (for lack of a better word) “defects.” The fact is, when it comes to investing, humans just ain’t built for it.

Psychology Vs. Economics

In order to understand how humans invest requires more than the study of economics; one also needs to comprehend behavioral psychology. Combining both cognitive science and behavioral economics can yield powerful insights into the conduct of investors.
I recommend Cornell professor Thomas Gilovich’s book How We Know What Isn’t So to investors all the time. The professor’s contribution to the investment community is his study of human reasoning errors. More specifically, Gilovich studies the inherent biases and faulty thinking endemic to all us humans. These faulty analyses are pretty much hard-wired into our species.
How do these defects manifest themselves? In all too many ways: Humans have a tendency to see order in randomness. We find patterns where none exist. While that trait might have helped a baby recognize its parents (thereby improving the odds for its survival), seeing patterns where none exist is counter-productive when it comes to investing.
We also selectively perceive data, hoping to find something that confirms our prior views. We ignore data that contradicts those prior views. We even reinterpret old evidence so it is more in sync with our perspective. Then, we only selectively remember those things that support our case. Last, we overuse Heuristics, which is defined as simple, efficient rules of thumb that have been proposed to explain how people make decisions, come to judgments and solve problems, typically when facing complex problems or incomplete information (call them mental short cuts). These short cuts often generate “systematic errors” or blind spots in our analytical reasoning.
And that’s only a partial list of analytical imperfections you have inherited.
The good news: These defects can be overcome.
We can develop an awareness of these specific defects, and we can learn to employ strategies that attempt to overcome these inherent analytical shortcomings.

What Have You Learned in the Past 2 Seconds?

Let’s place these defects into a historical framework within the context of the capital markets. My favorite illustration as to why humans simply aren’t hard-wired to undertake risk/reward analysis in capital markets comes from Michael Mauboussin, Legg Mason Funds’ chief investment strategist.
Mauboussin takes our evolutionary argument — the mind is better suited for hunting and gathering than it is for understanding Bayesian analysis — and places it into a chronological context. In an article titled What Have You Learned in the Past 2 Seconds?, he creates a timeline of human history scaled to equal one day.
He starts at the beginning: Homo Sapiens came into existence 2 million years ago. Next, Mitochondrial Eve, the common female ancestor among all living humans, lived less than 200,000 years ago. Last, he notes that modern finance theory, the framework to which investors are supposed to adhere, was formalized about 40 years ago. If all of human history were a day long, then investing is only about two seconds old. Is it any surprise that most humans do it so poorly? The vast majority of human history has been spent learning to survive, not analyze P/E ratios.
Learning to fight nature won’t be easy. To outperform, you sometimes must go against the crowd, despite the appeal and seeming safety in numbers. You must be humble and willing to admit error; meaning you’ll have to overcome your ego’s predisposition to avoid embarrassment, so as to maintain status amongst your tribe (and thereby enhance survival probabilities).
Most investors are overconfident to a fault. Don’t believe me? Consider the following anecdote: A man was terrified to fly, yet thought nothing of roaring down the street — sans helmet, no less — on his Harley. That reveals a high degree of confidence in his own skills vs. a highly trained pilot’s. That’s some risk-analysis engine you got there, bub.
That blind faith in our own abilities may have come in handy on mammoth hunts, but it is hardly beneficial when to comes to picking stocks. And that’s before we even get to the “flight or fight” response. Our natural instinct during periods of volatility is to stop the pain, not to endure it with patience. The natural reactions to discomfort or threat — coupled with a natural inability to be patient — doesn’t serve us well in the market. During market bottoms, most of the herd is selling. To buy during periods of intense selling means leaving the safety of the crowd, standing out, risking humiliation.
We simply were not designed for that.

Why Not Just Index?

This overconfidence leads to the optimistic yet misguided belief that most of us can beat the market. We must believe we can outperform the major indices. Otherwise, the rational thing to do would be to simply buy a major index and forget about it.
A few recent studies support those conclusions. One in USA Today found that most people are no good at investing, and another in The New York Times revealed that people have a poor grasp of basic economics.
Most investors — the 80% who underperform — would probably be better off going the index route. If you’re still interested in trying to outperform — despite all we discussed today — then I admire your gumption. Over the coming months, we will share some tools to do just that.
~~~
Next time, we will take a closer look at the competition. (Be afraid … be very afraid.)

Barry Ritholtz, The Big Picture

Saverio Manzo


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ontario car insurance
SAVE  on cheap car insurance ontario
Financial Planning advice is important.
SMall Business help here
car insurance quotes
car insurance Ontario  
Toronto car insurance 
Feel Green Good 

Ontario Car insurance for High Risk Drivers 09/16/11
Whether you are currently shopping around for Ontario car insurance, your policy is about to expire, something in your record has changed, you’re looking to save money on your current policy or you have been refused car insurance coverage, a policy is out there for you. Here’s how to get your coverage with the best car insurance quote in Ontario
> Read more

 

Saturday, August 20, 2011

The Psyche of the current state of the average investor

Buy on the dips?  or sell on the short rallies?

Much has been made of the billions of dollars that small investors have been pulling out of stock funds. However, some $4 trillion sits there—and most people still aren't selling. Too frightened and angry to buy, they are simply watching with a sense of helpless horror.

Greed may be good, but these days, investors are more likely to be consumed by another emotion: rage. Jason Zweig explains on The News Hub.

The mood of investors is at least as bad as in the darkest days of early 2009, when the financial world itself seemed about to end.

The old Wall Street cliché that "money chases performance" may need to be revised. Individual investors didn't pile into the stock market even as it roughly doubled in the 12 months after March 2009; nor, in this slump, are most investors abandoning stocks or making major portfolio changes.

People seem to feel like bystanders in their own financial lives—almost as if they were spectators at a racetrack equally incapable of stopping an impending car crash and of tearing their eyes away from it.
Two-thirds of the investors in the Decision Research survey said they had spent at least one hour a day over the previous week following the financial news. Yet a mere 6% bothered to call a financial expert for advice. And fully 51% of the investors said they hadn't even checked the performance of their own portfolios.

Nearly two-thirds of investors in the survey said they didn't plan to make any changes to their stocks and mutual funds over the next 12 months. Only 10% said they had changed their investments in the previous week to reduce risk—down by half from the same survey in September 2008. Just 6% said they had taken riskier positions in response to the market turmoil.

A typical comment, "I feel anger and distrust toward the government and the markets alike. "All the Federal Reserve does is look at the stock market and the big banks and figure out how to bail them out with my money," he says. "Then the bankers pay my money out to themselves as bonuses while the Fed keeps on depreciating all the savings that I worked so hard to build up all these years." 

In the short run, it always feels better to be a buyer when the market is euphoric; in the long run, the investors who make the most money are those who buy when the market is miserable. For investors full of anger and fear, however, benign neglect might be the best they can muster.

 Source:  Jason Zweig, WSJ Online




.
SAVE  on cheap car insurance ontario
Financial Planning advice is important.
SMall Business help here
car insurance quotes

Friday, July 29, 2011

Its all about jobs, dummy. Such a simple cure for so many problems

Note to politicians at all levels:  create jobs!

I wrote some time ago that jobs - people like you and me - being "employed" or in some legal fashion earning some form of reliable income - is the sure to many, many societal and economic problems. In my report, I emphasized the human nature aspect to jobs - the animal spirits within. Having a job is such an incredible part of who we are, and for good reason. But the bottom line is that by humans having a job, we gain on our ever so fragile self esteem (especially men), we provide for our families and this all leads to confidence - in spending. Spending begets company expansion, economic expansion and .... more job growth. Its no mystery. Just put policies in place to create jobs, oh dear politicians.

I keep hearing that what is holding U.S. businesses back from expanding and hiring is “uncertainty.” Exactly what new types of uncertainty businesses face in the current environment vs. past environments is rarely spelled out. But if, in fact, businesses are paralyzed due to uncertainty, I would not expect them to be stepping up their purchases of capital equipment. After all, capital equipment has a relatively long life. If businesses were unusually uncertain about the long-term outlook, they would be more reluctant to make longer-term commitments, which the purchase of capital equipment is. Rather, if businesses were unusually uncertain about the future, they might be more inclined to hire workers, who, after all, can be dismissed on short notice if conditions were to change suddenly. But just the opposite seems to be happening. Business hiring remains weak and business capital spending is robust.

I have my thoughts on this US debt crisis....and I am planning on writing about it soon ...probably gonna call it "How to deal with excessive government spending and debt...for dummies". Again, here, the solution is simple and mildly painful.

Saverio Manzo

+++++++++++++++++++++++
.
It makes good, practical sense to shop around before making any purchase and car insurance is no exception. If you are a driver in Ontario, we make the task of finding competitive, cheap auto insurance rates quick, easy and painless.SAVE NOW on car auto insurance in Ontario, Toronto with free quotes at
Earn more
Keep growth
Ontario car insurance



 

Saturday, July 9, 2011

So whats the longer-term outlook for Oil and car gas?

A slowing economy and massive government intervention and the price of WTI oil and gas for cars is still near a 3-year high. What gives?

Unlike past bubble pricing in financial assets, crude oil futures potentially have an element of reality to them because arbitrage opportunities exist between notional and delivery pricing when spreads get too wide. Within this context, consider the long term trend. WTI futures reached a peak of $145/barrel in 2008 before plunging to $45/barrel, traded mostly above $80/barrel since June 2009, above $90/barrel since December 2010, and above $100/barrel from February through mid-June of this year. Crude oil is in the midst of a multi-year bull market based on fundamentals. Unlike past bubble pricing in financial assets, crude oil futures potentially have an element of reality to them because arbitrage opportunities exist between notional and delivery pricing when spreads get too wide. Within this context, consider the long term trend. WTI futures reached a peak of $145/barrel in 2008 before plunging to $45/barrel, traded mostly above $80/barrel since June 2009, above $90/barrel since December 2010, and above $100/barrel from February through mid-June of this year. Crude oil is in the midst of a multi-year bull market based on fundamentals.

The math:  $100 in the price of crude WTI = approximately $1.30 per liter (average across Canada)

From our seat, the regional market gears are working smoothly. The globe is still short to the tune of 1.0-1.5 million barrels per day and no new meaningful supply will be added before 2015, as we forecast it.”

Desperate times call for desperate measures.

The marketplace is implying that a price range of $95 to $130/barrel is where supply meets demand (WTI & Brent) at the current level of global base money. This implies a price of car gas of $1.30 to $1.75 per liter.

If one wants to blame financial markets for higher gas prices at the pump then one should blame high levels of overall market sponsorship, which derives directly from high levels of investor leverage, which in turn is generated directly by banks through their lending and prime brokerage divisions, which ultimately derives from easy global monetary conditions.

So we think that the global marketplace for crude oil is naturally biased to trend towards pricing that global policy makers find problematic (too high vis-à-vis wages), and that global policy makers are desperately applying short-term fixes. They will lose. The marketplace reigns supreme over time whether or not there is temporary froth in futures markets.

Excerpts and quotes from: Lee Quaintance & Paul Brodsky